The Fun of Anti-Language

We recently had guest speaker Robin Queen come into class to talk about the games we play with our own language, and by languages it included both verbal and non-verbal languages as well. The thing that stuck out the most for me during the presentation was when she talked about anti-languages.  Anti-language is mostly used to distinguish members from a certain group or to communicate in way that only select few are permitted to hear.

This got me thinking about if there were any anti-languages that I heard of or used. The first think that I thought of was the abbreviations that we used while texting or chatting online. Like the use of “lol”, “smh”, “idk”, and many more. I feel this is a type of anti-language because if you’re not part of the generation that has adopted this type of language you will have a hard time understanding what is being said. It defiantly isn’t as complicated as the example she mentioned in class like Polari or the cockney rhyming slang, but when these saying are used you can get a better understanding of what type of group or generation they belong to.

I then realised that I also used anti-language as a way to be secretive and that was when I was younger and with my friends to try and be “cool” but at the same time not get in trouble with my parents. As with most my parents were defiantly not okay with me swearing so to try and be sneaky we would say  “shut the front door!” or “what the french toast”.  Our parents had no idea what we were saying but we felt so cool because to us, that was the same thing as swearing.

Here is a funny Orbit Gum commercial that uses some of that disguised swearing I was talking about.

The Hunger Games and Ancient Rome

Spoiler Alert: contains key plot points from The Hunger Games Trilogy

http://www.jensc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/HG2.jpg

One of the things I noticed while reading The Hunger Games Trilogy was the numerous ways in which the Capitol resembles ancient Rome, probably the most obvious being the gladiatorial like games that they hold for both the punishment of the defeated and for their own entertainment.  However, the resemblance goes much deeper than this.
Something that struck me almost immediately was the first names of the Capitol's citizens: Cinna, Caesar, Plutarch, Flavius, Octavia, Venia, to name a few.  The first name of every person from the Capitol is a traditional Roman name.  I decided that the author, Suzanne Collins, was purposely trying to create a connection in the minds of her readers between the Capitol and ancient Rome, and so I began searching for more similarities.

http://thehungergames.wikia.com

I then realized that both ancient Rome and the Capitol had penchants for excessive wealth that they relied entirely on their providences/Districts to provide.  A very specific example occurs in Catching Fire when Katniss is disgusted by the Capitol practice of making oneself puke at a dinner party in order to make room for more food.  The Romans also indulged in this disgusting habit.  I later discovered in Mockingjay, that Plutarch directly compares the conditions in the Capitol to the 'Bread and Circuses' of Rome.
There is also an interesting correlation between President Coriolanus Snow and the emperors of ancient Rome.  In ancient Rome, the emperors often gained and held power by whatever means necessary.  In Mockingjay, Finnick Odair reveals the brutal tactics that Snow used in his ascension to power, including a Roman favorite, poison.  Readers are treated first hand to the threats, torture, and executions Snow uses to maintain his position.
There exist many more examples I could point out but instead I'll ask a question.  Why is Suzanne Collins making these comparisons between the Capitol and an ancient civilization from thousands of years ago?  In Mockingjay, Plutarch mentions that Panem had once been a republic, another quality it shares with Rome.  Now think of the implications when considering that in the first book, Katniss relates that Panem was once known as North America.

http://www.crystalinks.com/romerecreation.html

Carl Becker stated in Everyman his own Historian, "to be prepared for what is coming to us it is necessary not only to recall certain past events but to anticipate the future."  I think Suzanne Collins trying to use her vision of a dystopian future to warn us that we need to learn from the mistakes of the past.  This is why she ends The Hunger Games Trilogy with Plutarch's expression of hope that the people of Panem will learn from their recent history.

Hunger Games or Hunger Wars?

            For my Book Quest I chose to read the entire series of the Hunger Games.  This trilogy has been talked about and advertised across the country for the past several months, with phenomenal reviews.  When the Book Quest was assigned, I felt a sigh of relief because now I had no excuse not to read the books, and I would be able to see what the rave was all about.  Shortly after beginning the first book of the trilogy, I found it extremely difficult to put down.  The story is engaging and made me feel as though I was a character in the book.  It also was interesting to read because I now have a whole new perspective of what constitutes a game.  The structure and plot of the story enabled me to look at games in a new and different way.  The Hunger Games is a story about a televised community competition, called “The Hunger Games” that takes place each year, in which only one competitor can survive.  This book directly correlates to the themes discussed throughout the 22 Ways of Thinking class.  I found that this book most closely related to the theme of Psychology, as discussed by both Stephen Garcia from the Organizational Studies department, and Susan Gelman from the Psychology department.

            Susan Gelman discussed the value and structure of games during childhood.  We discussed that play is a fundamental human activity in which children are able to express their creativity while conforming to particular rules, all to facilitate their learning. In the Hunger Games, the tributes are children between the ages of twelve and eighteen, somewhere between childhood and adulthood.  Although Susan spoke mostly about children in their young childhood, her theories and facts relate directly to the children participating in the Hunger Games, and the concept of games in general.  Susan discussed games as the way most people today think of them: fun, play, enjoyable, entertaining, and educational.  However, this is NOT the kind of game that takes place in the Hunger Games.  Instead, the Hunger Games is a competition in which the “Magic Circle” is an arena in which twelve districts have two competitors each to fight for their lives.  This differs from the traditional games discussed by Susan Gelman, because although there are set rules as most childhood games have, these games are not for fun and are most definitely not enjoyable for the participants.  In today’s society, most people would refrain from using the word “game” to refer to a life or death situation.  However, the people living in the time of the Hunger Games did.  In addition to games being fun and academic, Susan also mentions that play is a way in which individuals can express their creativity and conformity.  Within the Hunger Games, Katniss, Peeta and the other tributes are confined by many rules that govern the life competition.  In order to stay alive, the tributes had to use creativity to come up with innovative plans for hiding and killing others.  Because of the rules put in place, they were forced to accommodate the environmental conditions and the rules into their own skills and practices, something Susan proved as being part of traditional games with children as well.

            Stephen Garcia’s approach to discussing games also correlated directly to the implications within the Hunger Games.  He discussed the various aspects of competition and the motivations for people to perform at higher levels during competition.  He showed experiments that prove that people engaging in forms of competition have different motivations that therefore affect their performance.  For example, when Katniss is put under pressure in practice with few spectators, her usually perfect aim with the bow and arrow was completely thrown off.  However, during the actual gaming events, with thousands of spectators watching from home, her skills were near perfect.  This relates to the social facilitation theory which states that motivation and skill increase with the number of spectators watching. 

            Despite the Hunger Games mainly being about the actual fighting for survival, it also contained more abstract “games” that we discussed briefly in class.  Other than being an action novel, it was also a love story.  Through the different competition strategies endured, such as pretending to be in love, Katniss and Peeta eventually fall in love with each other, and they help each other through the gruesome competition.  As mentioned several times throughout the course, love can be considered a game because of the structured “rules” and variability involved.  Their love is portrayed throughout all three books, with the final book of the trilogy ending with the beginning of their life and family together. 

            I highly recommend this trilogy to anyone! After partaking in this class, I was able to look at the story from many perspectives and analyze it in a way I would have never thought before.  Because of the game-like nature of the book, I think it related perfectly to the course material.

Why Do We Focus on Final Four, not the Actual Championship?

     Don't get me wrong, I love college basketball, March Madness, and especially all the attention that is put on this tournament.  I'm a huge fan of the game entirely.  The level of competition with its exclusion of cash-based incentive makes the sport a lot more exciting than professional basketball.  However, where did this tradition of full attention of the final four start?  Why not the final two, or the actual championship?

     After four rounds of games already played, there is a long and much needed break for the players before the start of the national semifinals.  This round is obviously extremely important and much anticipated by almost all of America.  Then again, two of the teams in this round aren't even going to be competing in the national championship.  There is tons of media coverage, interviews, and analysis solely based on these final four teams for about a week's span.  By the start of the national semifinals, you almost get sick of hearing anyone debate about who is going to win.  Even before the tournament, when everyone is filling out all their brackets crazily, the most common question I hear among any group has to be, "Who's your final four?"  Again, when it comes down to it, two of these teams will not even be competing in the national championship, so why don't we let all the excessive predictions and analysis come once we actually know who is playing in the finals?
     I fully expect many people to disagree with my point, but it is kind of an interesting topic to debate when you take a closer look.  One of the most renown sports tournaments in the country has put so much emphasis and is even titled The Final Four aka The Semi-Finals.  I just don't get why we all, including myself, anticipate the national semi-finals of such a great tournament, rather than the actual finals.  I also am not implying that the national championship does not receive enough coverage, which I am positive that it does get its fair share.  I'm merely suggesting to maybe get rid of the famous title The Final Four and start recognizing it simply as The NCAA Championship, as it should be.

United Way & the NFL: Pledge to Make A Difference

I am about to embark on a new journey; I was one of 32 college students, selected nationwide for the United Way Team NFL Player Partnership. The United Way Worldwide has partnered with the NFL for over 35 years. United Way believes there are "three key building blocks of a good life: Education + Income + Health." However, the only way to achieve success is through education. 

As a member of the NFL & Strategic Partnerships, Brand Leadership team, I get paired with an NFL player (a United Way Team Ambassador) from one of the 32 NFL teams. My partner is Chris Canty, Superbowl XLVI winner, and New York Giants' Defensive Tackle (#99); it gives me great pride — both as a college student, and as a New York Giants fan — to spread the word about what Canty and the other players in the NFL are accomplishing to make a difference in their communities. 

Chris Canty attends benefit for United Way of New York

Together, Chris Canty and I are working to recruit 1,000 volunteer readers, tutors and mentors, in an attempt to help United Way Worldwide achieve their goal of reducing the number of high school dropouts in half by 2018. In addition, Chris Canty has his own foundation. His organization uses sports to make a positive impact on children through mentoring, educational programming and engaging physical activities, while promoting health and well-being. 

Help Chris Canty HERE

I invite you, to join me, my partner Chris Canty, United Way and the NFL, to cut the dropout rate in half by becoming a volunteer reader, tutor or mentor:


PLEDGE HERE: http://www.unitedway.org/team-nfl/players/chris-canty/


*Did you know that 60% of all 4th graders in the U.S. cannot read proficiently? Did you also know that 25% of students fail to graduate on time?

Something must be done. How will WE do this? — with YOUR help. Please sign this pledge to help cut the high school drop out rate in half. Something needs to be done, and YOU can do it. Chris Canty and I CAN'T do this without you. The difference between a graduate and a dropout could be you.

Starving Myself from The Hunger Games

The Midnight Premiere of The Hunger Games is officially only 23 hours away, and just like any other person who has read The Hunger Games I am dying to see the movie...so why am I going to wait?

Right now I am currently in the middle of the second book Catching Fire. This book is amazing and I envision all of the scenes as if I were there. I have images in my head for Katniss, Gale, Peeta, Haymitch, President Snow, the Capitol, District 12, Katniss' home, the rebellions...all of it! I am enjoying this book so much that I actually don't want it to end! However, I won't let myself see the movie until I am finished with the complete trilogy.

I love keeping the images I have in my head of everything Hunger Games related. When reading the books, I like to have my own vision of this atmosphere, which is not yet affected by any third-party visions of the same story. Therefore, I have been trying to steer clear of all Hunger Games related publicity including all trailers, magazine articles, and news-related stories. Trust me...this task has been very difficult. It really seems as if The Hunger Games talk is permeating and ever-present; discussion of this movie comes up on TV, on Facebook, on websites, and in conversations with my friends. However, no matter how difficult it may be, I am on a mission to avoid all images of this movie until I am absolutely finished with The Hunger Games trilogy. This may be a daunting challenge, but I won't let anything get in the way of my vision of Katniss and her world.

So while everyone is off seeing The Hunger Games, I will be off somewhere playing my own game...avoiding this movie at all costs!

What do you all think about this task? Do you like completing a book before you see a movie to keep your own personal visions of the story? Or instead do you not mind having the images of the movie mix with your own imaginations of the same story?

Hungry for the Hunger Games

I finally understand societies’ infatuation with The Hunger Games. Having just completed the first book in the series, I must say, I’m definitely hooked. When I read the first book, I laughed, I cried, I gasped, and I smiled with a great deal of suspense. Who could have thought the game of love could last so long? 

It centers around its’ title, The Hunger Games; in which, a set of “Games” occur annually. Each of the 12 Districts in a city of the future have two children ages 12-18, compete for survival, in a quest called, “The Games.” Every year, during the ceremony known as “the reaping,” two children are selected from each of the 12 Districts to participate in the event. The 24 children are thrown into an arena, with a forest-esq ambiance, in which they fight until there is one person left standing. A person’s likelihood of being chosen to participate increase year after year. Thus as age increases, so does one’s chances of being selected.

This year, the public witnessed a set of games, which tested the limits of love, lust, extremity and will to survive as Katniss Everdeen—the girl from District 12, who can kill squirrels, rabbits, and people with one shot from her bow and arrow, and Peeta Mallamark—the “baker’s son,” were faced with the ultimate test: partnership. I made so many predictions as to how I imagined the first book would end (all of which were erroneous); but, regardless, I already began reading the second book. I developed unique conjectures of the characters in the book and let my imagination paint a picture. Until I finished the book, I refrained from watching any of the film's trailers. The first time I saw Lions Gate's portrayal of the film was during last week's episode of the Ellen Degeneres show, where they shared a brand new trailer with the audience; who would have thought Lenny Kravitz would assume the role of Cinna--the stylist for District 12!?  The book in and of itself is riveting, and at the end, leaves the reader yearning for more (hence why I had to buy the second book, IMMEDIATELY). 

My creative vision of the book's characters ceases to exist, thanks to an inundation of images from US media coverage. Regardless, I finished the first book and the frenzy is everywhere. The next chapter will begin when Lionsgate releases, The Hunger Games, worldwide on March 23, 2012. Side note: (I finished the book the minute my plane touched down at a New York airport. The cover of Glamour was the first magazine I saw upon arrival. Can you guess who's on the cover?)

Entertainment Weekly: Jennifer Lawrence

Glamour: Jennifer Lawrence

Flare Magazine

Seventeen

Details: Liam Hemsworth

People Magazine: Collector's Special 

Are Games all Fun?

Who decides what is a game and what is not a game?  Since I was very young, my notion of a game was a fun, harmless, fictional realm in which there were set rules and an ending with some desired reward.  However, as I get older I am exposed to more serious and less fictional "games."  What happens when a fictional game is brought into real life and is no longer harmless?  Is this still considered a game?  As seen in The Hunger Games as well as a recent Law and Order: SVU, there is evidence of games in which the human life is at risk.

In The Hunger Games, representatives from each district are competing in a televised competition for survival.  The rules state that there can only be one winner, forcing all participants to rambunctiously kill all others in the game.  This "game" is neither fictional, fun, nor harmless.  It threatens the lives of all participants.  Similarly, in the episode of Law and Order: SVU called Hunting Ground, a man kidnaps women and plays a "game" with them.  He directly states the rules of the game in that each woman must act as an animal and be waited to be hunted by him and his gun.  In a dense forest, he searches for each woman and kills them.  He tells each participant that the only way to win the "game" is to die.  Based on these two similar life-threatening "games", my concept of what a game is has drastically changed.  I no longer think of it as a childish activity that is fun and harmless.  I now know that games come in many different forms, including ones in which death is the ultimate prize.